一切福田,不離方寸,從心而覓,感無不通。

Spring Boot 容器选择 Undertow 而不是 Tomcat

Spring Boot 内嵌容器Undertow参数设置

配置项:

来看看源代码:

https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/blob/master/core/src/main/java/io/undertow/Undertow.java

很显然,Undertow认为它的运用场景是在IO密集型的系统应用中,并且认为多核机器是一个比较容易满足的点,Undertow初始化假想应用的阻塞系数在0.8~0.9之间,所以阻塞线程数直接乘了个8,当然,如果对应用较精确的估测阻塞系数,可以配置上去。

 

Spring Boot内嵌容器支持Tomcat、Jetty、Undertow。为什么选择Undertow?

这里有一篇文章,时间 2017年1月26日发布的:
Tomcat vs. Jetty vs. Undertow: Comparison of Spring Boot Embedded Servlet Containers

1. Setup Spring Boot Application

We will use Maven to setup a new project in Eclipse with the appropriate dependencies. We will use the starter parent for this example but the dependencies in a production application will likely be altered to streamline, optimize or customize.

1.1 Setup Spring Boot Dependencies

The default embedded servlet container is Tomcat. This version of Spring Web 1.4.3 brings in Tomcat version 8.5.6.

pom.xml

1.2 Setup Spring Boot Main Application and Controllers

To setup the Spring Boot application you include the @SpringBootApplication annotation in your Main class. The @SpringBootApplication annotation brings in @SpringBootConfiguration@EnableAutoConfiguration and @ComponentScanannotations.

Application.java

You may choose to eliminate this annotation and add the @SpringBootConfiguration alone or to another class that allows you to customize the configuration. The @ComponentScan will scan your application for items like the @Controller you will need to setup a RESTful service. The following controller will return a simple “Hello World” string from a HTTP GET request. We have also included in the bundled example another endpoint mapping that returns a complex object type.

SampleController.java

1.3 Key Configuration Parameters

The default properties for all the embedded servlet containers are the same. Some of the most important properties to consider are the properties for configuring startup information like ports and application name, TSL, access logs, compression and many more.

For example, to configure SSL add the following to key value pairs to the application.properties.

application.properties

1.4 How to Find Additional Parameters

To explore the parameters for Spring boot applications you can add the Spring actuator dependency and the @ConfigurationProperties annotation to your Main class. You then visit the /configprops endpoint on your application to get a list of the available properties.

Application.java

pom.xml

http://localhost:8080/jcg/service/configprops

1.5 Change version of Embedded Servlet Containers

The embedded servlet container versions are defined in the following parent dependency from the pom. You can change the version of the embedded servlet container by explicitly including the dependency and identifying a new version in the pom. We will show you how in the examples below.

pom.xml

2. Tomcat

As Tomcat is the default embedded servlet container there is nothing you need to do to the default implementation to use Tomcat. You can change the version of Tomcat you are using or change properties in the pom.xml or application.properties files.

2.2 Change Version of Tomcat

pom.xml

3. Jetty

To change the embedded servlet container to Jetty you need to edit the pom file to remove the Tomcat dependency and add Jetty.

3.1 Change to Jetty (version 9.3.14)

pom.xml

4. Undertow

To change the embedded servlet container to Undertow you need to edit the pom file to remove the Tomcat dependency and add Undertow.

4.1 Change to Undertow (version 1.3.24 final)

Notice the undertow version included in the spring boot starter is incorrect, referring to 1.3.25. You’ll need to change it to 1.3.24.Final for this to work at the time of this article.

pom.xml

5. Performance and Load

In this example, we will analyze both the peformance of HTTP requests and the memory footprint at startup of all three embedded servlet containers. We used JMeter to measure performance by simulating load and JVisualVM to look at the memory footprint.

5.1 Measure Performance

In this example, we will analyze both the peformance of simple RESTFul GET requests that return a string and more complex GET requests that return complex JSON objects. JMeter is the tool used to measure the performance of the the three different types of containers. The key to setting up this test was establishing thread groups with the appropriate load, a counter to dynamically update the input to the API and report viewers to display or aggregate the results. For the simple string examples, we used a thread group with 1000 threads that would loop 3 times through the sequence. It also used a ramp up time of 10 seconds. For the complex object examples, we used the same parameters but did not loop.

JMeter Tomcat Thread Group

JMeter Tomcat Summary Report

5.1.1 Tomcat

5.1.1.1 Simple String
Label # Samples Average Min Max Std. Dev. Error % Throughput Received KB/sec Sent KB/sec Avg. Bytes
Startup 3000 7 1 549 35.78374361 0 293.8583603 55.95935572 55.67238466 195
Others 3000 1 0 45 1.359661682 0 287.8802418 54.82094449 54.53981144 195
Others 3000 1 0 24 1.155032275 0 292.1129503 55.62697785 55.3417113 195
5.1.1.2 Complex Object with Dynamic Data
Label # Samples Average Min Max Std. Dev. Error % Throughput Received KB/sec Sent KB/sec Avg. Bytes
Startup 1000 114 3 1601 322.8671905 0 97.68486861 202.3335999 19.93763432 2121
Others 1000 3 2 17 1.328216473 0 97.88566954 202.7495167 19.9786181 2121
Others 1000 2 1 16 1.110529603 0 98.52216749 204.0678879 20.10852833 2121
Others 1000 2 1 21 1.344498419 0 98.53187506 204.0879951 20.11050966 2121

5.1.2 Jetty

5.1.2.1 Simple Object
Label # Samples Average Min Max Std. Dev. Error % Throughput Received KB/sec Sent KB/sec Avg. Bytes
Startup 3000 7 0 561 40.13705065 0 291.5168594 56.0828333 55.22878 197
Others 3000 1 0 21 1.058925031 0 293.5995302 56.48350338 55.6233485 197
Others 3000 1 0 21 0.926034317 0 294.3485086 56.62759395 55.7652448 197
5.1.2.2 Complex Object with Dynamic Data
Label # Samples Average Min Max Std. Dev. Error % Throughput Received KB/sec Sent KB/sec Avg. Bytes
Startup 1000 110 3 1397 278.7961107 0 98.13542689 203.3626717 19.93375859 2122
Others 1000 3 2 20 1.500210319 0 98.48335631 204.0836739 20.00443175 2122
Others 1000 3 2 45 2.729377218 0 98.29942003 203.7025091 19.96706969 2122

5.1.3 Undertow

5.1.3.1 Simple Object
Label # Samples Average Min Max Std. Dev. Error % Throughput Received KB/sec Sent KB/sec Avg. Bytes
Startup 3000 6 0 451 31.6188702 0 295.6830278 63.81440346 56.01807363 221
Others 3000 1 0 22 1.255447862 0 292.7400468 63.17924839 55.46051669 221
Others 3000 1 0 18 1.559477975 0 294.3773918 63.53262069 55.77071681 221
5.1.3.2 Complex Object with Dynamic Data
Label # Samples Average Min Max Std. Dev. Error % Throughput Received KB/sec Sent KB/sec Avg. Bytes
Startup 1000 70 3 1114 197.1333241 0 97.059109 203.3969361 19.62044201 2145.893
Startup 1000 42 3 852 132.6443576 0 98.02960494 205.6324135 20.00799554 2148
Others 1000 3 2 19 1.293570253 0 98.55129595 206.6305004 20.01823199 2147
Others 1000 2 2 27 1.659250132 0 98.74592673 207.0385788 20.05776637 2147
Others 1000 2 1 17 1.260904041 0 98.28975821 206.0821395 19.96510714 2147

 

5.2 Measure Memory

To measure the memory of each embedded servlet container we looked at the memory usage on startup. JVisualVM is a tool provided with the Java Development Kit for visualizing the memory and footprint of java applications. We used this tool to show the initial startup impact of each of the three embedded servlet containers. The heap size and thread counts are key in analyzing this initial footprint. The ten threads that are common to all three containers include: JMX server connection timeout, RMI Scheduler, RMI TCP Connection (2), RMI TCP Accept, Attach Listener, DestroyJavaVM, Signal Dispatcher, Finalizer and Reference Handler.

JVisualVM Report

5.2.2 Tomcat

Heap Size: 697,827,328 B
Used: 124,260,976 B
Max: 2,147,483,648 B

Threads: 17 Live, 22 Started

5.2.3 Jetty

Heap Size: 628,621,312 B
Used: 311,476,776 B
Max: 2,147,483,648 B

Threads: 19 Live, 22 Started

5.2.4 Undertow

Heap Size: 630,718,464 B
Used: 114,599,536 B
Max: 2,147,483,648 B

Threads: 17 Live, 20 Started

6. 对比

6.1 性能

压测结果:从上面的6张压力测试报告中,可以看到3个容器在相同的用例及并发请求下,Undertow稍微比Tomcat和Jetty好一点。

资源消耗:JETY启动时内存占用最大,使用311 MB。Tomcat和Undertow的初始脚印相似,在120 MB左右,Undertow出现在114 MB的最低水平。响应头中的关键差异在于默认情况下默认情况下包括HTTP持久连接。该头将在支持持久连接的客户端中使用,以通过重用连接细节来优化性能。

6.1.1 Tomcat Response Headers

6.1.2 Jetty Response Headers

 

6.1.3 Undertow Response Headers

7. 结论

这些数字表明Undertow在性能和内存使用方面是最好的。令人鼓舞的是,Undertow 正在接受最新的能力,并默认为持久的连接。这些数字并不表示在这个例子中使用的负载有显著的性能差异,但我想它们会缩放,如果性能是最重要的因素,则Undertow 是应用程序的正确匹配。认为一个组织可能因为熟悉它的能力而喜欢嵌入的servlet容器也是合理的。很多时候默认设置将不得不改变,因为应用程序要求包括性能、内存使用和功能。

=========================分割线=================================================================================

在Spring Boot中使用 Undertow 而不是 Tomcat

1、Maven示例:

2、配置Undertow,application.yml示例:

3、使用 Undertow 监听多个端口示例:

 

from:https://www.cnblogs.com/duanxz/p/9337022.html